Goals for the New Year

    

Ready for laminating!

     One of the things I love about teaching is that each year we get to reinvent ourselves.  This is not like making a New Year's Resolution where everybody knows the old you.  We literally get to reinvent ourselves with a group of people who know nothing about the way we were before.  It's a remarkably exciting feeling, to say the least. 
     This year my personal/professional goals are linked closely to my class make-up.  Last year 40% of my class had documented special needs (IEPs or 504s).  This year it's 0%.  This means I will not be eligible for any support in my classroom.  Because I teach in a district with high needs, this has never happened to me before.  What an opportunity!
     However, it's not going to be a year I can just coast.  No one in my class may have documented special needs, but there are still students who are struggling.  Also, meeting with the third grade teachers, I kept hearing, "Bright, but no motivation."  over and over.
     So these are my classroom goals that I'm going to be blogging about for the coming school year:
1.  Pump Up the Learning Center
When I hear about kids that lack motivation, I instantly think learning games.  I have tons of learning games and have used a learning center with various degrees of effectiveness for many years.  Now it's time to really invest in making it work.  A full blog post on this is coming soon!
2.  Making Daily Five Even More Motivational
I love Daily Five, but every year I have a few kids who are not motivated by it.  In fact, sometimes the very fact that I don't assign work makes them think I've given them a license not to carefully read grade level material for comprehension.  I'm still keeping Daily Five, but I'm going to have students write a short summary after each book they read (instead of a weekly journal) and earn Book Bucks.  Each quarter I will have an auction where they can use their  Book Bucks to purchase items.
3.  WBT 2.0
Have you heard about Whole Brain Teaching?  Well, Coach B has reinvented it with his newest version that emphasizes critical thinking and writing.  I am pumped!
4.  Tweaking Differentiated/Common Core Aligned Everyday Math
Last year I had the high average group for Math and also did not have any support.  So I created a differentiated weekly plan that aligned the outdated EDM version we have with the Common Core.  (see this blog post)  It worked out very well and my students made excellent progress.  I need to use that plan again, because I have about five students coming in with NWEA scores at the end of fifth grade range.  I'm going to have to use some fifth grade materials and I'm not sure how well that will go over with the fifth grade team, but I'm still gonna try.

Rounding Strategies: 3NBT1, 4NBT3, 5NBT4

     After a rough start, my leveled Math class is going smoothly at last.  My students have gotten into a routine of a whole-class lesson on Monday (with pre-test), differentiated instruction based on the pre-test on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, finishing with another whole-class lesson on Friday with a final, standards-based quiz on that day.  Most students are seeing growth as they graph their pre- and post-assessments.  With this leveled group, I have often found that the class doesn't usually fall into three groups, like I have seen with heterogeneous groups in the past.  Quite often, they only fall into two groups.  This has lead to some changes in my I Love Math groups.  Most of the time, I divide the class into two groups.  One works with me while the other works on their Ten Marks or Manga High assignments on the computer.  Then the switch.  When there is a preponderance of students who have mastered the pre-test, I will often include Wednesday as an additional whole-class lesson. 
     This past week we worked on rounding.  Rounding was one of those skills that no one in the class was even close to mastering, even after the first whole-class lesson.  I had to dig deeper in order to meet my students' needs.
     The first resources I used was Learn Zillion.  Using the Quick Code LZ525 you can see a great lesson that uses a number line to show how to round.  We used the following template:

original number:_____________________

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

__________                                                   __________                                                    __________

low benchmark                                                 midpoint                                                 high benchmark

 

     For each  number, they created an individual number line and place the original number as a dot on that number line.  This was a time consuming process, but after doing several together, the light bulb went on for many struggling students who could finally SEE what it means to round.

     After a differentiation day where I reinforced this method, I taught method number 2.  This I introduced as a "game" I called "Slap! Trap!".  I passed out a place value chart and a highlighter.  (Kids always get excited when the highlighters come out!)  Students used a pencil and the chart to write the number to round. 

  I announced: "Round to the nearest thousands!".  Students repeated: "Thousands, thousands, thousands, slap, TRAP!"  When they say slap, they use their left pointer finger to cover the digit in the given place.

 

 When they say trap, they color the digit in the next place to the right with the highlighter.  If the digit they "trapped" is 5 or more, the digit they "slapped" will go up by one.  If not, it will stay the same. 

 

All the digits to the right of the slapped/rounded digit turn into zeroes.  Any digits to the left of the slapped/rounded digit stay the same.  After the number line method, this seemed like a shortcut to many students.

     After instruction, some students gravitated to one method; some to the other.  In the end, all students benefitted from learning both methods.

Week 2 Update: I Love Math

     Those of you that know me well know my passion for differentiated groupings that I call "I Love Math" groups.  I Love Math is a structure  that divides the class into a high, average, and low group and cycles those groups through three different stations.  Once the students get the rotations (which are always in the same order no matter what group the child starts with), things run like clockwork.  In the past I have always had an aide, Title One teacher, or special education teacher in my room to help ensure things go smoothly.  That way two of the groups have adult supervision.
     This year, for the first time, our grade has been required to level for Math.  Since I was in the fifth grade at the time, I could not attend the meetings where they assigned teachers to the different levels.  I have one of the average groups.  Two of our classes (mine and the high group) do not have a support person in the classroom for Math.  The other six specialist are divided among the bottom three classes.  This is my first year trying I Love Math groups by myself.  I knew it would be a real test of the structure that I love so much.  If I can do it alone, then there is hope for other teachers who are solo practitioners.  And yes, even a leveled Math group has enough differences in it to warrant differentiated instruction.
     First of I decided that I needed to have I Love Math groups a lot more often.  In the past I have done them regularly (once or twice a week), but only as needed. I know that the more I do them, the better the students get at it.  I decided that this year I would have a whole class lesson on Monday which would end with an ungraded pre-test.  This would be used to create differentiated groups Tuesday through Thursday.  Friday will be another whole class lesson and post-test.
     I also knew that I needed to use technology to help me keep track of the progress of my students in the same way that another person used to  do.  Luckily I found Ten Marks, a free site where I can assign specific skill lessons for my students. 
     After one week of following this plan the results have been fairly good.  Technology has been the biggest challenge.  Our wireless internet is not always reliable and the students are not used to logging in to the computers and finding websites in a timely manner.  I hope that time and experience will help the students complete this part of the task more quickly and easily.  If not, I may have to alter the activities or the order.  I wish I had enough computers for all of the students to start on them and then move to other activities, but the most I can get are 8.
     Great ideas are worth the time it takes to make them successful.  I'm up for the challenge!

Working On Writing

My "Triple Threat"

A rubric that shows the child's baseline level (black circle), and their goal (green box).

When I score a piece of writing, I copy this rubric and circle the level that they obtained 

in the assignment with a colored marker.

So when any assignment is scored, the child can see where they were (black circle),

where they should be (gray box), and where they are now (colored circle).

I just got back from a wonderful workshop sponsored by my school.  The training was a continuation on our work with professional learning groups (PLGs).  We had complained that we had too little time to really delve into the PLG process that was new to us during the school year.  Although we have a common planning time of 45 minutes, most of the protocols we were given were designed for 60 minutes or more.  There was a little bit of extra money in our Race to the Top grant, so we used it to work out some unresolved dilemmas using the PLG format.
Our grade level team discussed Writing.  Both this year and next, budget cuts have forced us to make do with less paraprofessional support.  Paraprofessionals are assigned, not to classrooms or teachers, but to individuals or groups of students.  So if none of your students had a goal in a certain subject area, such as Science or Social Studies, you would not have a paraprofessional support during that time.  We felt this most impacted our instruction in the area of Writing.  It is very rare for any fourth grader in our school to have an IEP goal in Writing because very little writing is done in grades K-3, due to Reading First.   Yet many of our learning disabled, language disabled, and ADHD students struggle with the writing demands of fourth grade.  In our PLG we discussed methods to refine our instruction in the Writing Workshop to meet the needs of these students, who often need a lot of our time, and yet be fair to other students.  To boil down the essence of our discussion, we came up with ways to target our instruction based on goals, increase the amount of differentiation, and empower our writers with a growth mind-set.
And thus my latest TpT product was born!  I have worked long and hard the part week on this massive 25-page resource for writing.  It is designed for grades 3-8 and draws on the work of Gail Boushey and Joan Moser ("The Sisters", authors of The Daily Five and The CAFE Book) and the work of Lucy Calkins (known for her Units of Study) but it is my own "take" on the work of these fine master teachers.  Just some of the things it contains are:
- a detailed, 12-page Launching Guide for the Writing Workshop.  All of your instruction for the first seven days is included.  You don't have to plan anything.  The first seven days are the most important so that you set the tone and standards for the year.
- creative activities like Writing collages, and editing necklaces

- my favorite forms (with instructions) for assessment and data tracking in Writing, including:
          - a kid-friendly, baseball-themed Writing rubric

          - my best selling 6 Traits Goal Tracker and Individual Conferring Form
          - 6 Trait Super Grouper Form (for creating small groups based on assessment data
          -  a letter to parents on how to read their child's assessment rubric
The best part is that this product is ON SALE right now for HALF OFF!  That's right, followers!  If you purchase this product before July 11th you get the sale price.  Buy it on July 11th and it goes back to the regular (but still a bargain) price.  So why not treat yourself today?
By the way, I'm not done creating new products this summer. by a long shot.  Right now I'm working on a daily multi-digit numbers and operations review called "4 in 5".  There will eventually be a third, fourth, and fifth grade version.  Right now I'm working on the fourth grade version.  Click here for a sneak peek!

Triangulating Data FREEBIE

I recently finished one of my professional books for the summer:  Assessment in Perspective: Focusing on the Reader Behind the Numbers by Claire Landrigan and Tammy Mulligan.

In this book the authors talked about triangulating data. This means taking data from different sources and compare them side-by-side to build a complete profile of a student's strengths and weaknesses.  I thought a nice way to do that would be in graph form.  So I created a data triangulation form for my Math class.  My form is specific to the grade level I teach and the assessments we use.  For you, dear reader, I have created a generic form that you can use with any grade level and whatever assessments you use.   

Let me know how it works out. 

Differentiated Language Arts and Math

One of my goals this year is to use more pre-tests to inform my instruction.  My first experience with this was in Language Arts.
As a fifth grade team, we identified vocabulary skills as a weakness in our students.  Part of that is knowing how to use a dictionary.  The first day of school, I gave my students a pre-test on the skills of using a dictionary to define multiple meaning words, using a pronunciation key, putting words in alphabetical order (to the third letter), and using guide words.  Using their scores, I created a personalized packet for each student with just the skills they needed.  Two students demonstrated mastery in the pre-test, so they had challenging activities which they completed as a team.

 

Three students did very poorly, so they worked with an aide in a small group on slightly easier skills.  

The rest of the class participated in a mini-lesson each day on a different skill, then worked independently on their packets.  

Today I gave the post-test and 90% of the class passed.  Go kids!
My second experience with pre-tests was did not go as smoothly.  I pre-tested my Math class for the first unit.  Most of the material should have been review, but clearly it wasn't.  So I greatly reduced the scope of the unit, since I had only alloted two weeks for it.  My original plans were to teach factors, multiples, arrays, prime, and composite numbers, prime factoring, multiplication properties, and divisibility rules.  I decided to stick with factors, multiples, primes and composites.  We spend a week on factors alone because it was so difficult for them.  We did many activities:  Venn diagrams, foldables with examples and rules, games from our Math series, and traditional worksheets.  We even color-coded a hundreds chart with colors that represented the different multiples.  Students were allowed to use their interactive Math notebooks, their student reference book, or the definition wall during the test.  
Despite all of this, many students failed the test.  When I thought about why I had two very different outcomes, I came to the conclusion that my Language Arts students corrected their own pre-test.  They knew what they needed to work on.  I also used differentiated instruction with my Language Arts class where I didn't do as much of that with the Math class.
For the Unit 2 pre-test, I came across a site called Mastery Connect.  Mastery Connect is a site that links Common Core assessments in Reading and Math and tracks student progress.  The basic service is free.  I couldn't find an assessment that really matched the skills I will teach in Unit 2, so I made one and posted it to the site.  It was easy to add the scores to my "tracker" and visually track what skills students have and need.